Feeding Catastrophe

/ Social Epistemology / Cosmology /

Anthropomorphic Neologism

I’m watching a DVD on supermassive black holes. I’m learning from it, enjoying it, glad to meet some of the talking heads: and at the same time the bullshit writing is driving me crazy. It’s not as bad as George Page on Nature, that’s the nadir of nadirs: every other statement is an anthropomorphic fallacy. But here, in the supermassive black hole doc, take for example this: the narrative talks about “the most destructive force in the universe”: presents black hole nature as a catastrophe. The narrative talks about the black hole as “feeding”. Feeding is a catastrophe? Why don’t they just talk about the universe, the black hole, and stop confusing us with human valuations. We don’t know what’s going on inside a black hole: why assume that it’s “destructive” or “nutritional”? Why can’t it be whateverthehell it is and ditch the hss social metaphors?

I’ve finished it now, wonderful! except for the willfully anthropo-writing.

Another example: the program had identified supermassive black holes as a recent concept: 1971, refined 2001 … How can something new to theory be imagined as “most destructive”? Did Pompey know about it? Hannibal? Caesar? … Genghis? Einstein? “Recent” here is another human-ocentric fallacy.

Notice the strong resemblance between popularizing science and polluting theology with human wishes. We think going to hell is bad; but if God puts us there, then by definition, it’s not bad, it’s good. Being in jail may be inconvenient for Charles Manson; but it’s convenient in the extreme for Roman Polanski. Mass murder and movie making are incompatible. Britain didn’t want to lose her American colonies, but without the revolution being successful then all the things we celebrate as “American” wouuldn’t have occurred, wouldn’t be true.

If we’re sucked into a black hole, then … Then what? We don’t know what! Therefore, we can’t say whether it’s catastrophic or pure heaven.

I think we should think cosmology, refresh the ideas constantly, be utterly loyal to the data; and cease grading it, cease labeling it.

Society Social Epistemology Cosmology Etc.

About pk

Seems to me that some modicum of honesty is requisite to intelligence. If we look in the mirror and see not kleptocrats but Christians, we’re still in the same old trouble.
This entry was posted in cosmo. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s